
The stay-or-go decision is rarely about rent alone. It is about cost, risk, and whether your space still fits your business.
Most tenants frame the lease-expiry decision as a rent negotiation. It is better framed as a strategic choice between two fully-costed paths.
If your current space no longer fits how your people work — too little collaboration area, too much dedicated office, the wrong configuration — a rent reduction will not fix the underlying problem. Assess your spatial needs first.
Staying carries costs tenants often overlook: make-good on a new lease term, refurbishment to bring the space up to standard, and the opportunity cost of an incentive you might command by moving.
Going carries its own: fitout, furniture, IT, moving, and the disruption of the move itself.
A renewal offers continuity and certainty. A move offers a space that fits your business today — but introduces delivery risk. The question is whether the strategic benefit of a new space outweighs the execution risk of getting there.
Each step informs the next. Skipping the first — your requirements — is the most common reason tenants end up in the wrong space at the wrong price.
The best stay-or-go decision is the one made with both paths costed honestly. The worst is the one made by default, because the runway ran out before the question was properly asked.
The most expensive mistake a tenant makes at lease expiry is starting a conversation before their strategy is set. Here is why impulse costs you leverage — and how informed negotiation pays for itself.
Eighteen months is the minimum runway a tenant needs to make an informed decision rather than a reactive one. Here is what to do with it.